Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMarcinkowski, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorFennell, Angela Marie
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T17:01:11Z
dc.date.available2015-04-20T17:01:11Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11141/559
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D) - Florida Institute of Technology, 2014en_US
dc.description.abstractFlorida Tech’s campus-wide GTA professional development training, the GTA Seminar, has no clear theory on which it was designed, employs only measures of satisfaction and open-ended feedback, and performs limited follow-up on GTAs. Further, two pilot studies I conducted indicate that GTAs’ concerns may not be fully addressed by this seminar. This is notable because the GTA Seminar is often the only means of professional development available to more than half of the GTAs on campus. The purpose of my study was to investigate 13 GTAs’ teaching concerns, self-reflections, and practice when implementing three professional development sequences during their assignments over one semester: responsive coaching, video playback, and responsive coaching paired with video playback. I used a qualitative methodology, implemented 3 rounds of the professional development sequences, and collected different forms of data. I developed case studies for each member of the 4 groups in my study (i.e., including a comparison group). These case studies allowed me to describe each individual GTA, including his/her: background information; self, task, and impact concerns; levels of reflection; teaching practice; and apparent changes over time. Using these case studies, within-group and between-group comparisons were done to explore any influence of these professional development sequences on the teaching concerns, reflections, and practices of GTAs. Although I was unable to detect any influence of the professional development sequences, the outcomes of my study were somewhat consistent with Fuller’s (1969) theory in that beginner GTAs had self concerns. However, all 13 participants of the professional development sequences had concurrent task concerns. There was one unique participant in each group with additional high-level impact concerns and higher levels of self-reflection. These outcomes may be grounded in the GTAs’ multi-role status, the pre-organized nature of their assignments, and their level of maturity and/or educational course history. Further, the GTAs’ feedback indicated they preferred expert consultation and appreciated the professional development sequences of the GTA Seminar and this study.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCC BY Creative Commons with Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.titleA Qualitative Study of Florida Tech Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Response to Coaching, Video Playback, and Coaching Paired with Video Playback with Regard to their Concerns, Self-Reflections, and Practice of Teachingen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy in Science Educationen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineScience Educationen_US
thesis.degree.departmentDepartment of Education and Interdisciplinary Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorFlorida Institute of Technologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY Creative Commons with Attribution
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY Creative Commons with Attribution