Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWeaver, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSoucy, Bridgette
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T15:38:20Z
dc.date.available2020-10-13T15:38:20Z
dc.date.created2020-07
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.date.submittedJuly 2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11141/3177
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.) - Florida Institute of Technology, 2020.en_US
dc.description.abstractOyster restoration efforts, including Living Shoreline and Living Dock projects, utilize aquaculture-grade plastic oyster mats to mitigate the decline of benthic communities. Aquaculture-grade plastic are known for strength, durability, and resilience to degradation in seawater. Over time, plastics break into microscopic segments commonly referred to as microplastics. Microplastics represent a major concern as marine organisms mistake the small particles for food. Plastics bioaccumulate in marine species, which impacts the marine food web and humans. In order to reduce further negative anthropogenic impacts, natural fibers and nature-inspired concrete mixtures were utilized across a series of experiments in order to determine an appropriate alternative material to replace plastic in Living Dock projects. In Phase 1, coconut coir, jute, resin-coated basalt, and uncoated basalt replaced plastic oyster mats. Preliminary results revealed coconut and burlap materials are desirable for Living Dock projects and marine organism settlement, however the basalt material lacked the strength properties conducive for this usage. For Phase 2, coconut coir, two strengths of jute, and cement-coated basalt were tested. Assessment resulted in coconut coir as the recommended natural fiber for replacement in Living Docks. Phase 3assessedthe feasibility of concrete-coated natural fiber mats as an alternative. Compression strength, flexural strength, and community settlement resulted in concrete coated coconut coir being the recommended material from Phase3.While continued research is recommended, from results across the three phases of this study, coconut coir –with or without concrete –was the most suitable replacement for plastic in the Living Dock application.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleAlternative Material Selection for Oyster Restoration with an Emphasis on Living Docksen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.updated2020-10-07T16:59:16Z
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Ocean Engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineOcean Engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.departmentOcean Engineering and Marine Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorFlorida Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.type.materialtext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0