Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWebbe, Frank M.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Kaci Lee
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-27T19:27:20Z
dc.date.available2019-08-27T19:27:20Z
dc.date.created2020-05
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.date.submittedMay 2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11141/2880
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.) - Florida Institute of Technology, 2018.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The present study was designed to establish Baseline concussion normative data for non-athlete students using the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-5), Rey Word Recognition Test (RWRT), The A Random Letter Test of Auditory Vigilance (A-Test) and the Rey Dot Counting Test (DCT). The study considers the comparative differences when the non-athletes are told to complete the task to the best of their ability, to those who are told to perform poorly on purpose, and those who are instructed how to perform badly. Method: Sixty non-athlete students at Florida Institute of Technology volunteered in the study using the university’s online research system. For comparative purposes, a random sample of 20 student-athletes were selected so that their scores on the Baseline measurement could be contrasted with the Honest Effort and sub-optimal effort groups. The non-athlete participants were randomly assigned to either the Honest Effort group, Fake Bad group, or Coached Fake Bad group and the concussion Baseline protocol used on the student-athletes. Results: As predicted there were significant differences found between Honest Effort groups and sub-optimal performance group scores and typically there were no significant differences found between Baseline and Honest Effort scores. ROC analysis provided cut scores for the three measures of effort (DCT, RWRT, & A-Test) to allow examiners to compute scores which label athletes as having suspect effort. Conclusion: Overall, the measures used were found to be suitable indicators of suboptimal performance in college athlete baseline concussion testing. Additionally, the study highlights strong predictors including Omission totals on the A-Test, the DCT combination score, RWRT combination score, the SCAT total symptoms reported and symptoms severity. The results also provide optimum cut scores to help examiners with suspect effort.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org.licenses/by/4.0/legalcodeen_US
dc.titleNorms for Baseline Concussion Testsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Research Projecten_US
dc.date.updated2019-08-16T15:24:43Z
thesis.degree.nameDoctorate in Clinical Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineClinical Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorFlorida Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.type.materialtext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0