Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWebbe, Frank
dc.contributor.authorKissinger-Knox, Alicia Miran
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T20:44:00Z
dc.date.available2017-11-09T20:44:00Z
dc.date.created2019-05
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.date.submittedMay 2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11141/2198
dc.descriptionThesis (Psy. D.) - Florida Institute of Technology, 2017.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The present study was designed to investigate the clinical utility of recaptured baselines or “rebaselines” in collegiate athletes after return -to-play. Several concussion management teams endorse the use of baseline neurocognitive assessments at the beginning of an athlete’s sports season to use as a measure of comparison in the instance of concussion or head injury. Once physical and cognitive symptoms are resolved, an athlete is requested to reestablish their baseline for the rest of the season. It has been questioned whether this “rebaselining” is necessary and warranted. Method: Forty-one Division II collegiate athletes at Florida Institute of Technology who sustained a concussion during the respective sport season were studied across four testing sessions; baseline, post-trauma, follow-up, and rebaseline. The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) was used to examine four composite scores; verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor, and reaction time across the four testing sessions to assess for significant change over time. Results: As predicted, there were no significant differences found between the follow-up assessments and rebaselines. Significant differences were found in all composite scores between post-trauma evaluations versus follow-up and rebaseline assessments. Significant interactions were additionally noted for sex, sport, and first exposure to the ImPACT measure. No significant interactions were found between a prior history of concussion and the length of recovery across the testing sessions. Conclusions: The current study found no empirical validity (and hence no clinical utility) for the procedure of rebaselining. Therefore, it is recommended that concussion management programs discontinue to use of rebaselines and use the follow-up assessment as an athlete’s new baseline for the remainder of the sport season.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright held by author.en_US
dc.titleThe Clinical Utility of Recaptured Baselines after Return-to-Playen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Research Projecten_US
dc.date.updated2017-11-06T18:38:52Z
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineClinical Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorFlorida Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.type.materialtext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record